CLAUDE LABJP
MODEL — Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 landed on September 1. They are the same underlying model; only the strength of the safeguards differsPRICING — Per-token rates hold at $10/$50 per MTok. What changed is cache reads, cut 75% to $0.25 per MTokCOST — How much that saves depends on your workload: roughly 25% for typical use, up to about 45% for context-heavy agentic work. Worth measuring your own split before quoting a numberBENCH — Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 climbs from 24.7% on Fable 5 to 52.6%. Anthropic also states a standard error of 3.5-4.5 points, which is worth remembering before reading small gaps as realSAFEGUARDS — Sharper cyber safeguards cut interventions in Claude Code sessions by roughly 60% on average. Finding vulnerabilities is now allowed; developing exploits still is notAPI — New API accounts created from today can no longer edit prior context while preserving Claude's thinking transcript. It is an anti-distillation measure, and existing accounts are unaffected for nowMODEL — Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 landed on September 1. They are the same underlying model; only the strength of the safeguards differsPRICING — Per-token rates hold at $10/$50 per MTok. What changed is cache reads, cut 75% to $0.25 per MTokCOST — How much that saves depends on your workload: roughly 25% for typical use, up to about 45% for context-heavy agentic work. Worth measuring your own split before quoting a numberBENCH — Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 climbs from 24.7% on Fable 5 to 52.6%. Anthropic also states a standard error of 3.5-4.5 points, which is worth remembering before reading small gaps as realSAFEGUARDS — Sharper cyber safeguards cut interventions in Claude Code sessions by roughly 60% on average. Finding vulnerabilities is now allowed; developing exploits still is notAPI — New API accounts created from today can no longer edit prior context while preserving Claude's thinking transcript. It is an anti-distillation measure, and existing accounts are unaffected for now
TAG

Cursor

4 articles
Back to all tags
Related:
Claude Code4comparison1AI coding1developer tools1VS Code1SKILL.md1gh skill1GitHub CLI1AI agents1Copilot1Devin Desktop1Windsurf1
Claude Code/2026-07-09Beginner

Claude Code and Cursor: Stop Trusting Benchmarks, Measure on Your Own Repo

A comparison of Claude Code and Cursor built on three things you can verify: design philosophy, agent capabilities, and how each one bills you. Includes a runnable procedure for measuring time and token cost on your own repository, plus how to draw a boundary when running both.

Claude Code/2026-05-06Intermediate

How gh skill Lets You Share SKILL.md Across Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, and 30+ AI Agents

The gh skill GitHub CLI extension lets you publish and install SKILL.md definitions across Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and 30+ AI agents — write once, deploy everywhere.

Claude Code/2026-04-19Advanced

Claude Code × Cursor × Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf): A Practical Hybrid Development Setup

How to route work across Claude Code, Cursor, and Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) — and sync rules into the directory format, measured over five consecutive runs.

Claude Code/2026-03-09Intermediate

Cursor × Claude Code Integration Guide — The Ultimate AI Dev Combo

How to combine Cursor editor with Claude Code CLI for maximum development efficiency. Setup, practical workflows, and tips for using both tools together.